Comfortex Home pageAbout ComfortexCustomer Service
Safely Supporting Healthcare
Clinical Report
Clinical Report
Clinical Report
Clinical Report
Pressure Relief
Pressure Relief
Pressure Relief
Testimonials

Pressure Relief 2 -
Non-Mechanical Therapeutic Surface Comparison
Providence Medical Center
Portland, Oregon

On November 6, 2002, an Interface Pressure Evaluation
was conducted with staff members from Providence
Medical Center, Portland, Oregon. The volunteer, a 200 lb. healthy male was used to compare the pressure reducing capabilities of an Air Chambered mattress, a Foam-Gel mattress and Comfortex’s Rest-Q mattress.

Interface pressures were recorded on a computer assisted X-Sensor pressure monitoring device. A pillow was positioned beneath the subjects’ head.

Position: Laying Flat

Pressure relief chart
  Heel Area Sacral Area Shoulder Area
Air Chambered      
Readings over 30 mmHg 25 264 207
Readings over 52 mmHg 3 0 2
Foam-Gel      
Readings over 30 mmHg 30 196 150
Readings over 52 mmHg 4 0 1
Rest-Q mattress      
Readings over 30 mmHg 18 191 64
Readings over 52 mmHg 1 0 0

Rest-Q™ ... an advancement should simplify the process,
reduce costs and improve the outcome.

 

Direct Supply